sunday tribune logo
 
go button spacer This Issue spacer spacer Archive spacer

In This Issue title image
spacer
News   spacer
spacer
spacer
Sport   spacer
spacer
spacer
Business   spacer
spacer
spacer
Property   spacer
spacer
spacer
Tribune Review   spacer
spacer
spacer
Tribune Magazine   spacer
spacer

 

spacer
Tribune Archive
spacer

So, just what is the price?
Helen Rogers



IF THE new pricing system for auctions was supposed to bring greater clarity for buyers sick of the discredited 'guide price' practice, then the results from the first full week of Dublin auctions are sending out very mixed messages.

There were a total of 13 auctions around the capital and, of these, eight properties either sold under the hammer or after the auction.

But of those that sold, in all cases the price was way above the new "advised minimum value" (AMV) now being quoted by estate agents who are members of the Irish Auctioneers and Valuers' Institute. This AMV is meant to represent the estate agent's true opinion of the market value of the property at the start of the marketing campaign.

But last week, one commercial/residential property, 75 Mespil Road, Dublin 4, sold at a Lisney auction for 1.05m above its 1.65m guide price . . . 63% over its AMV.

Sherry FitzGerald's Lewis Beirne set an AMV of 1.75m on a bungalow on 0.8 of an acre, Gort na Blaigh in Ballymount Dublin 24. It sold for 2.475m . . . 41% over the AMV.

While these two properties were more difficult to price because of their commercial/development potential, other more mainstream residential homes got equally strong prices.

Douglas Newman Good's AMVs on three northside starter properties were particularly low . . . two apartments on Nelson Street went for 18.4% over their pre-auction AMV, while a charming period redbrick cottage, 22 Connaught Parade in Phibsborough, Dublin 7, unsurprisingly went for 392,000 . . . 20% above its eyecatchingly low AMV of 325,000.

Agents argue that they can't be responsible if buyers want to bid much higher than the AMV in the auction room . . . but rather confusingly, the properties which were withdrawn at auction are also now on the market at higher prices than the minimum value being advised by the agents.

Douglas Newman Good had truly massive viewings at 5 Frascati Park in Blackrock, Co Dublin, but it failed to sell at auction.

It was withdrawn at its AMV of 1.4m but now carries an asking price 100,000 higher at 1.5m. This is 7% above the advised minimum value.

The same goes for 22 Brooklawn, Mount Merrion Avenue in Blackrock which was withdrawn at its 1.4m AMV and is now quoting 1.5m through Sherry FitzGerald.

Agents say they must follow their clients' instructions when quoting an asking price set after a property has been withdrawn.

But although the gap between the old auction "guide price" and the real price the buyer wants to achieve is narrowing under the new advised minimum value system, for buyers the new system is so far not providing the sort of accuracy they had hoped for.




Back To Top >>


spacer

 

         
spacer
contact icon Contact
spacer spacer
home icon Home
spacer spacer
search icon Search


advertisment




 

   
  Contact Us spacer Terms & Conditions spacer Copyright Notice spacer 2007 Archive spacer 2006 Archive