sunday tribune logo
 
go button spacer This Issue spacer spacer Archive spacer

In This Issue title image
spacer
News   spacer
spacer
spacer
Sport   spacer
spacer
spacer
Business   spacer
spacer
spacer
Property   spacer
spacer
spacer
Tribune Review   spacer
spacer
spacer
Tribune Magazine   spacer
spacer

 

spacer
Tribune Archive
spacer

GREAT MINDS THINK ALIKE?



THERE were extraordinary similarities in the language, tone and syntax of email responses from the Department of Finance and pressure group the American Chamber of Commerce in Ireland (AmCham) in response to inquiries from the Sunday Tribune about the transparency of Ireland's tax treatment of US multinationals.

Both organisations denied that Ireland was a tax haven because, as AmCham explained, "the names of companies that set up in Ireland are in the public domain and financial information can be accessed by anybody".

Meanwhile, the Department of Finance said: "The names of companies that set up in Ireland are in the public domain and financial information can be accessed by anybody."

AmCham and the Department of Finance also had identical views on the tax systems of other countries with higher tax rates.

AmCham: "Many countries offer generous tax write-offs and while their nominal rates of taxation appear high the effective tax rate is very low. In Germany, for example, insurance companies can claim very generous write-offs."

Department of Finance: "Many countries offer generous tax write-offs and while their nominal rates of taxation appear high the effective tax rate is very low. In Germany, for example, insurance companies can claim very generous writeoffs".

Both organisations also share remarkably similar opinions of the US tax system.

Department of Finance: "The US has one of the toughest tax regimes in the world and has sophisticated rules to prevent US companies from availing of tax deferral in low tax jurisdictions."

AmCham: "The US has one of the toughest tax regimes in the world and has sophisticated rules to prevent US companies from availing of tax deferral in low tax jurisdictions."

Several other examples of the use of identical language come throughout both responses. But given the eagerness of the Department of Finance to avoid the appearance of inappropriately facilitating US multinationals in any possible effort to avoid scrutiny of their tax arrangements, we assume that both arrived at their language independently.




Back To Top >>


spacer

 

         
spacer
contact icon Contact
spacer spacer
home icon Home
spacer spacer
search icon Search


advertisment




 

   
  Contact Us spacer Terms & Conditions spacer Copyright Notice spacer 2007 Archive spacer 2006 Archive