sunday tribune logo
 
go button spacer This Issue spacer spacer Archive spacer

In This Issue title image
spacer
News   spacer
spacer
spacer
Sport   spacer
spacer
spacer
Business   spacer
spacer
spacer
Property   spacer
spacer
spacer
Tribune Review   spacer
spacer
spacer
Tribune Magazine   spacer
spacer

 

spacer
Tribune Archive
spacer

Grattan Street plans get go-ahead

 


PLANS to demolish a number of buildings on Grattan Street in Dublin 2 and to construct a mixed use development on the site have been sanctioned by the planning board. Permission has been granted for the demolition of the Grattan Motors building and two adjacent structures and for the construction of an apartment block with a medical centre and a sandwich bar on the site. The sanctioned development is a modified version of the original proposal submitted by Robert Montgomery and appealed to the board by a number of local residents.

The original proposal, to erect a three-/five-storey over-basement building including 11 apartments, was rejected by An Bord Pleanala, which ruled that the building should be a maximum of four storeys high and comprise nine apartments. The planned development will also include a basement car park with 12 spaces, a 240sq m medical centre and a 180sq m ground floor sandwich bar.

In order to safeguard the amenities of adjoining residential occupiers, the board is restricting the hours of operation of the sandwich bar to between 8am and 6pm, Monday to Sunday inclusive.

Under the Dublin City Development Plan, the site is, in the main, zoned Z2, residential (conservation areas) . . . "to protect and/or improve the amenities of residential conservation areas". The southeastern corner of the site is zoned Z6, employment/enterprise (light) . . . "to provide for the creation and protection of enterprise and facilitate opportunities for employment creation".

Objections to the proposal included claims the development would have "an overbearing, overshadowing and overlooking" impact on adjacent dwellings and that the proposed structure would constitute "an overdensification on a restricted site which is out of keeping with the established pattern of development in the area". Objections to a proposed roof garden centred on claims it would constitute a safety hazard and would result in a loss of privacy and would seriously damage the residential amenities of the area. The planning board instructed that details of the landscaping and boundary treatment of the roof garden should be submitted for the written agreement of the planning authority.

The board ruled that, subject to specific conditions, the overall development "would not seriously injure the amenities of the area or of property in the vicinity or significantly detract from the character of the residential conservation area."




Back To Top >>


spacer

 

         
spacer
contact icon Contact
spacer spacer
home icon Home
spacer spacer
search icon Search


advertisment




 

   
  Contact Us spacer Terms & Conditions spacer Copyright Notice spacer 2007 Archive spacer 2006 Archive