The leader of the Labour Party, Eamon Gilmore, is at the centre of a row with the Catholic hierarchy after he refused to apologise for criticism he made of Pope Benedict's teachings on homosexuality in a recent newspaper interview.
This has prompted the head of the Catholic Communications Office, Martin Long, to accuse Gilmore of being unwilling to accept he made a mistake. Long said Gilmore had "misrepresented" comments made by the Pope. However, a spokesman for Gilmore has strongly denied this and Gilmore has refused to apologise.
The disagreement centres around a recent Irish Examiner interview during which Gilmore was reported to have asked Benedict to "temper" statements on homosexuality as his hard-line stance encouraged discrimination.
"We have many examples of where there is not only discrimination against gay people, but there has been nasty homophobic bullying and assaults on gay people and I think opinions like that give comfort to that," Gilmore said.
Long subsequently issued a press release in which he angrily sought to refute Gilmore's comments, claiming he appeared to have been referring to an address by Benedict to cardinals, bishops and priests delivered on 22 December 2008.
This speech was, he said, "subsequently interpreted incorrectly by some media outlets."
Long told the Sunday Tribune that, by the middle of last week – a week after writing to Gilmore personally to highlight his concerns – he had yet to receive an acknowledgement of the communication.
"I think that is indicative of Gilmore's attitude. The fact is that homosexuality was not referred to anywhere in this text. It seems that Deputy Gilmore didn't read the Holy Father's address, which was widely misinterpreted. What we have here is just an attempt to pigeonhole the Catholic church's teaching on human sexuality," he said. "Unfortunately, when a mistake is made, especially by a leading politician, it should be rectified."
Gilmore's spokesman confirmed that Long had sent a copy of his statement to Gilmore, but had not given any indication that he was seeking a response.
"Eamon Gilmore did not quote the Pope's speech. The speech and the interpretation put on it by many people were put to him by the journalist conducting the interview," he said.
"We note the interpretation of the Pope's comments given by Martin Long. We also note that others, including members of the gay community, have interpreted them in a different way."
It seems RCC representatives only want it one way and that's "their way". For example, they recently cried over being criticised for sticking their noses into the Civil Partnership debate but can't take comments, in my mind, comments that didn't go far enough, from Eamon Gilmore. We all know the RCC's teaching/views on all sexuality. I suppose it must be galling to Martin Long and even his leader that the vast majority of people think RC dogma is of little or no relevance to living their lives as is obvious from how people select how their use their churches. Better for everyone, i believe, is to care for all under civil law.
Eamon Gillmore is absolutely correct to admonish the Church for its abomnible and anti-Christian campaign against homosexuals. In doing so, they legitimate the discrimination and abuse of their fellow human beings. It is no coincidence that they follow their 30+ year campaign to hide and protect its cult of pederasty - legitimating it to themselves in some of the most digusting and perverted ways - by attempting to distract their followers with a new campaign to shift antagonism away from themselves and toward an already marginalized and violently vulnerable group. It is reprehensible for them to do so.
Catholics and every other christian group who dare to use religion to justify the oppression of others, are making a mockery of their faith. Irish Catholics, who have been the victims of centuries such mean-spirited behavior and beliefs, should understand the danger of twisting a religion of peace and nonjudgemental acceptance into a philosophy that legitimates the abuse and domination of others.
They are no different than the Orange Order thugs - and the politicians and clergy who support them - who ritually abuse their neighbors with parading. Violence invariably follows.
I'm an elected member of Dublin City Council, an Independent with an interest in clerical sexual abuse. I also do some advocacy work with victims . About a month ago I wrote to Archbishop Martin (which I had never done before) and hand delivered the letter to Archbishop's Palace. I was requesting Archbishop Martin to take a personal interest in a civil case that was up for settlement the following week. I was passionate about this particular case as it was the worst case of sexual abuse I had ever heard. I won't be going into the details as it is a very private matter but believe me that nobody reading this would even be able to imagine the horrendous abuse carried out. In any case I was hoping that the Archbishop would instruct that a generous tangible expression of remorse be paid out on behalf of the Church. That wasn't the case on the day and the victim had to go through a horrific few hours down at the Law Library. In any case...and the point of my letter... I haven't received even the courtesy of an acknowledgment (4 wks later) from Dr Martin and I ask Mr Long of the Catholic Communication Office does he feel that is indicative of Archbishop Martin's attitude....I hope not !!!
Cllr Damian O'Farrell
Independent Member of DCC
Comments are moderated by our editors, so there may be a delay between submission and publication of your comment. Offensive or abusive comments will not be published. Please note that your IP address (204.236.235.245) will be logged to prevent abuse of this feature. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions
Subscribe to The Sunday Tribune’s RSS feeds. Learn more.
Why would anyone expect Eamon Gilmore to apologise. It takes a good man to acknowledge he is wrong and Eamon Gilmore is not a good man, just a populist politician who will jump on any bandwagon if it gains him favour with the hoi polloi and at this moment in time it is very easy to curry favour with the hoi polloi by criticising the Catholic Church, even if you don't know the basic tenets of that religion.